Israel has approved a limited framework for an international force in Gaza, but the Security Council—not Israel—provides its legal authority. The deployment’s legality depends on Resolution 2803, occupation law, Palestinian consent, command, immunity, and accountability.

An armed attack is more than an unlawful use of force. This article explains the Article 51 threshold, the ICJ’s scale-and-effects test, direct and indirect attacks, non-state actors, cyber operations, repeated incidents, and the legal consequences of classification.

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter establishes the general prohibition on interstate threats and uses of armed force. This article explains its historical development, legal scope, relationship with self-defense and Security Council authority, contested exceptions, and the consequences of an unlawful use of force.

The Genocide Convention defines genocide as specific acts committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, in whole or in part. This article explains the Convention’s origins, legal elements, duties to prevent and punish, individual and state responsibility, leading international cases, and continuing enforcement limits.

Monism and dualism offer competing explanations of how international law operates within domestic legal systems. This article examines reception, constitutional rank, direct effect, customary international law, individual rights, and comparative state practice.

The Houthi maritime blockade claim raises difficult questions under naval warfare, the law of international straits, and international humanitarian law. This article examines whether a non-state armed group can blockade Saudi ports, restrict neutral shipping, or lawfully close Bab el-Mandeb.

War crimes are serious violations of international humanitarian law, the body of rules governing armed conflict, for which individuals can be prosecuted and punished (ICRC, 2005).

Iran’s missile attack on a US base in Jordan killed two American service members. This analysis tests the strike against the UN Charter, Jordan’s sovereignty, and the law of targeting, and explains why an unlawful use of force is not automatically a war crime.

International Human Rights Law governs how states exercise power and protect individuals and peoples. This article explains its sources, obligations, jurisdiction, limitations, remedies, supervisory institutions, and the gap between recognizing a right and achieving effective compliance.

ICJ preliminary objections determine whether the Court has jurisdiction, whether claims are admissible, and which issues may proceed to the merits. This article explains the governing rules, leading cases, procedural effects, and limits of preliminary adjudication.

A policy brief proposing a Treaty for Autonomous Weapons with prohibitions on unpredictable and anti-personnel systems, plus enforceable human-control duties.

Policy brief on Security Council veto reform, Article 27(3), mass-atrocity paralysis, self-interested veto use, and realistic Charter-consistent options.

The Unsettled Law of Self-Defence Against Armed Non-State Actors policy brief analyzes when Article 51 may permit force against armed groups operating from another state’s territory without consent, and why the law remains contested.

Policy brief on cyber operations below the Use-of-Force Threshold and the case for a due diligence standard for responsible state conduct in cyberspace.

A policy brief proposing an Arrest Cooperation Mechanism to address ICC non-cooperation, Article 87(7) referrals, and arrest warrant enforcement.

Enforcement jurisdiction determines when a state may arrest, search, seize, compel, intercept, or execute against persons, property, vessels, aircraft, or data. This article examines territorial limits, lawful authority abroad, immunity, human rights safeguards, and the consequences of unlawful coercive action.