top of page


Chemical Weapons Under International Law: The CWC, OPCW and Accountability
Chemical weapons are prohibited under international law, but enforcing that prohibition remains a challenge. This article examines the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), the OPCW's verification and investigative powers, chemical agents such as VX and sarin, and the legal mechanisms for holding states and individuals accountable for chemical weapons use.


The Right to Education Under International Law: What States Must Provide
The right to education imposes binding obligations on States under international human rights law. This article examines Article 13 of the ICESCR, the requirements for primary, secondary, and higher education, immediate and progressive obligations, non-discrimination, educational freedom, and the legal mechanisms used to enforce educational rights.


Tokyo Trials: War Crimes, Legality, and International Law
The Tokyo Trials prosecuted Japan’s wartime leaders for crimes against peace and conventional war crimes, but their legal legacy remains contested. This analysis examines the Tokyo Charter, the 1948 judgment, individual criminal responsibility, judicial dissents, and accusations of victor’s justice to assess the tribunal’s contribution to international criminal law.


Trump to End Israel Aid: Can the US Walk Away From Its $38bn Aid Pledge?
Trump's announcement that the United States will end annual military aid to Israel raises questions about the $38 billion commitment signed in 2016. Although the agreement is a nonbinding political undertaking, existing congressional appropriations and federal law limit the president's authority to terminate assistance.


MSC Poesia Detained in Miami: Can the US Hold a Foreign-Flagged Cruise Ship?
MSC Poesia was detained in Miami by the U.S. Coast Guard. Examine the legal authority under SOLAS, port-state control, and the rights of cruise passengers.


US Strikes on Qeshm Island: Is a ‘Defensive’ Strike Lawful Self-Defence?
The US strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island on November 2, 2026, were described by American officials as defensive measures against Iranian missile threats. Their legality under Article 51 depends on the existence of an armed attack and whether the response satisfied the requirements of necessity and proportionality.


The Right to Water Under International Law: Is Clean Water a Human Right?
The right to water is recognized under international human rights law, but its legal foundations and enforceability require careful distinction. This article examines the ICESCR, General Comment No. 15, UN Resolution 64/292, and landmark judicial decisions to explain what access to clean drinking water guarantees, the obligations imposed on states, and the limits of international legal protection.


Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ): History, Jurisdiction and Landmark Cases
Established under the League of Nations system, the Permanent Court of International Justice shaped international adjudication before its dissolution in 1946. Its landmark judgments in Mavrommatis, S.S. Lotus, and Factory at Chorzów developed principles of jurisdiction, diplomatic protection, and state responsibility that continue to influence international law.


South Africa Faces AGOA Removal: Can the US Legally Cut Its Trade Benefits?
The United States plans to remove South Africa from AGOA on January 1, 2027, despite extending the trade-preference program through 2028. This analysis examines whether the decision is lawful under US legislation and WTO rules, the limits of presidential authority, and the consequences for South African trade.


The Right to Life Under International Law: Scope, Limits and State Duties
The right to life is a fundamental guarantee under international human rights law, protecting individuals against arbitrary deprivation of life. This article examines its legal foundations, permissible limits, and state obligations under the ICCPR, ECHR, and regional human rights systems, including protection against unlawful killing, positive duties, armed conflict, and accountability.


Modern Slavery Under International Law: Forced Labour, Trafficking and Debt
Modern slavery under international law: explore forced labor, human trafficking, debt bondage, the Palermo Protocol, ILO conventions, and state obligations.


Swift Observatory Falling to Earth: Who Is Liable If Debris Causes Damage?
NASA’s Swift Observatory is approaching uncontrolled reentry after nearly 22 years in orbit. If surviving debris causes injury or property damage, who must pay? The 1972 Liability Convention establishes rules governing the United States’ responsibility, compensation claims, and legal remedies. The Cosmos 954 incident provides an important historical precedent.


Apartheid Under International Law: How It Became a Crime Against Humanity
Apartheid evolved from a system of institutionalized racial domination in South Africa into a crime against humanity under international law. This article examines its historical origins, international condemnation, the 1973 Apartheid Convention, the Rome Statute, and its continuing legal prohibition.


Declaration of War in International Law: Is It Still Legally Required?
Is a formal declaration of war still legally required? This article examines Hague Convention III of 1907, the UN Charter, and the Geneva Conventions to explain when declarations are required, how armed conflicts can exist without them, and what the Iran conflicts reveal about modern international law.


Prisoners of War Under International Law: Rights, Status and Release
The Third Geneva Convention establishes who qualifies as a prisoner of war and the legal protections governing captivity. This article examines combatant status, POW rights, humane treatment, criminal responsibility, and the rules governing release and repatriation after the cessation of active hostilities.


Martens Clause: Meaning and Legal Effect in Armed Conflict
The Martens Clause affirms that civilians and combatants remain protected by international law even when treaties do not expressly regulate particular situations. Its customary status is recognized, but its independent legal effect remains disputed. This analysis examines its Hague origins, competing interpretations, international jurisprudence, and application to emerging military technologies.


The Lieber Code of 1863 and Its Influence on the Laws of War
Issued during the American Civil War, the Lieber Code of 1863 established military instructions governing warfare, civilian protection, prisoners of war, and military necessity. Its provisions influenced subsequent international codification, including the Hague Conventions, while reflecting the legal and humanitarian limitations of nineteenth-century warfare.


Raphael Lemkin and the Development of Genocide Law
Raphael Lemkin transformed the understanding of genocide through his legal scholarship and diplomatic advocacy. His work influenced the adoption of the 1948 Genocide Convention, although the treaty adopted a narrower definition than his original conception. Examine his 1933 proposals, the Nuremberg Trials, and his contributions to international law.


Atlantic Charter: Eight Principles, Legal Status, and Legacy
Issued by Roosevelt and Churchill in August 1941, the Atlantic Charter established eight principles for the postwar international order. This analysis examines its legal status, the contested promise of self-determination, tensions with colonial rule, and influence on the development of the United Nations Charter.


Nansen Passport: History, Purpose, and Legal Significance
Introduced in 1922 under the League of Nations, the Nansen Passport enabled refugees lacking effective national protection to obtain internationally recognized travel documents. Examine its creation, eligibility requirements, legal limitations, and historical significance, including its contribution to the development of international refugee law and the 1951 Refugee Convention.


The Yalta Conference of 1945 and Its Legal Significance
The Yalta Conference of February 1945 shaped the postwar international order through agreements concerning Germany, Poland, liberated Europe, and the United Nations. Examine the decisions reached by Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin, their legal significance, and the tensions between great-power diplomacy, sovereignty, and self-determination.
bottom of page

