UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons: A New Human Rights Treaty

Introduction

The UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons is a proposed international human rights treaty intended to strengthen protection against age discrimination, abuse, neglect, exclusion, and violations of personal autonomy affecting older people. The United Nations is negotiating a legally binding instrument to address deficiencies in the protection of rights already recognized under international law. The convention has not yet been adopted, and its substantive provisions remain under discussion.

The initiative entered a new phase on April 3, 2025, when the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted Resolution 58/13, establishing an intergovernmental working group mandated to prepare a draft international convention. The group held its first substantive session in July 2026 and its second in Geneva from October 26 to 30, 2026. Negotiations concern the rights that a future treaty could guarantee, the obligations states might assume, and the institutional arrangements needed to supervise compliance (Human Rights Council, 2025).

The proposal responds to a persistent question in international human rights law: whether universal guarantees provide sufficiently clear and effective protection against discrimination and abuses associated with older age. Although existing treaties recognize rights applicable throughout life, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has identified significant gaps in their interpretation, application, and monitoring. These deficiencies are especially apparent in matters concerning legal capacity, long-term care, autonomy, social protection, and access to remedies (OHCHR, 2022).

Regional treaties in the Americas and Africa already provide specialized protections, but no equivalent comprehensive United Nations convention is currently in force. The negotiations could establish more specific universal standards, although their eventual legal significance will depend on the provisions governments adopt, the states that become parties, and the effectiveness of domestic implementation and international supervision.

1. The Proposed UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons

The proposed UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons is intended to establish a comprehensive international legal instrument addressing the human rights of individuals in older age. Its purpose is to strengthen the enjoyment of fundamental rights in circumstances where discrimination, dependency, institutional practices, or inadequate public services can restrict their exercise. The initiative recognizes that formal equality under general human rights instruments does not always produce effective protection.

Human Rights Council Resolution 58/13, adopted without a vote on April 3, 2025, provides the institutional foundation for negotiations. Its first operative paragraph establishes an open-ended intergovernmental working group mandated to elaborate and submit a draft legally binding instrument to the Council. The resolution also provides for participation by states and relevant stakeholders and directs attention to previous United Nations findings concerning gaps in the protection of older persons (Human Rights Council, 2025).

The resolution is not itself an international convention. It authorizes the preparation of a future treaty, leaving governments to negotiate its definitions, substantive rights, general obligations, and monitoring arrangements. The expression "UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons" describes the proposed instrument, although its definitive title has not been established through an adopted treaty text.

Governments have not acquired new substantive treaty obligations merely because the Human Rights Council established a negotiating mandate. Their existing responsibilities continue to arise from applicable international treaties, customary international law where relevant, and other binding commitments. Additional obligations under a future convention would depend on its terms, entry into force, and each state's consent to be bound.

The proposed instrument is also concerned with more than protecting individuals against abuse. Its development reflects an understanding of older people as holders of rights to autonomy, equality, dignity, participation, and access to essential services. A person does not lose fundamental freedoms or legal personality simply because of advancing age. A dedicated convention could clarify these principles and establish more specific standards for situations in which existing protections have proved inadequate.

2. The October 2026 UN Treaty Negotiations

The second substantive negotiating session took place at the Palais des Nations in Geneva between October 26 and 30, 2026. It followed an organizational session held on February 18–19 and the first substantive session of July 13–17. The organizational meeting addressed procedural arrangements, while the subsequent sessions considered the general architecture and possible content of a legally binding instrument (United Nations, 2026).

The October discussions were organized around five thematic areas: the preamble, definitions, general principles and state obligations, a catalogue of rights, and implementation and monitoring arrangements. These subjects cover the principal elements governments must resolve before a complete treaty can be agreed. They also reveal the breadth of the negotiations, which concern both substantive legal guarantees and the mechanisms necessary to supervise their implementation.

Five pairs of co-facilitating states were appointed to advance consultations. The Philippines and Serbia were assigned the preamble; Slovenia and Uruguay, definitions; The Gambia and Qatar, state obligations; Australia and Brazil, the catalogue of rights; and Malta and Lesotho, implementation and monitoring. These assignments established responsibilities for further discussions without settling the wording or legal effect of any proposed provision (GANHRI, 2026).

The working group also selected Ambassador Ricardo de Souza Monteiro, Brazil's Permanent Representative in Geneva, as chair-rapporteur for 2027. He will succeed Ambassador Carlos Mario Foradori of Argentina, who chaired the group's initial substantive negotiations. Brazil's incoming chairmanship was associated with plans to advance consultations toward concrete treaty provisions and a preliminary draft during 2027.

The proposed timetable envisaged additional written submissions, consultations between formal sessions, and examination of developing treaty language. A third substantive session was expected in July 2027, with a possible zero draft later that year. These remained prospective negotiating milestones, subject to further procedural decisions, rather than an agreed date for the convention's adoption (GANHRI, 2026).

National human rights institutions and civil society organizations participated alongside government delegations. Organizations representing older persons emphasized the need for accessible participation and for treaty provisions that reflect the diversity of older populations. Their contributions addressed issues including discrimination, institutional care, individual autonomy, social protection, and the design of future accountability mechanisms.

The October session did not produce an adopted convention or a final catalogue of legally binding rights. It established a more detailed basis for subsequent drafting while leaving important disagreements unresolved. The negotiations have progressed beyond examining whether existing protections are sufficient, but governments must still determine the substantive obligations they are prepared to accept.

3. Gaps in the International Protection of Older Persons

Older persons are already entitled to the fundamental rights recognized under applicable international human rights treaties. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights establish guarantees that apply throughout life. Specialized conventions also provide protection against particular forms of discrimination. Their existence, however, has not eliminated uncertainty about how international standards apply to the circumstances of older age.

In January 2022, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights issued a report examining the international standards and obligations relevant to older persons. The report, A/HRC/49/70, identified fragmented and inconsistent protection, insufficiently developed legal standards, and limited attention to older persons within existing human rights mechanisms. It examined difficulties concerning age discrimination, autonomy, long-term care, legal capacity, protection against violence, and access to remedies (OHCHR, 2022).

A central difficulty is that age is not expressly enumerated among the prohibited grounds of discrimination in the principal international human rights covenants. Their open-ended provisions can encompass age, but the applicable standards have developed through treaty-body interpretation and other materials rather than through a comprehensive global treaty specifically addressing older persons. This arrangement can make the content of relevant obligations less visible and less consistent.

The United Nations High Commissioner's assessment distinguishes deficiencies in legal standards from failures to implement existing obligations. A normative gap may arise where a right has not been sufficiently defined for a particular situation. An implementation gap occurs when a recognized right is inadequately protected through legislation, administrative practice, or enforcement. These problems require different responses, and a new treaty would not automatically eliminate failures in national implementation.

More recent United Nations assessments have reinforced the need to distinguish legal protection from practical access to rights. The Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons addressed cognitive impairment in report A/HRC/63/35 and autonomy in situations of dependency in report A/81/177, both issued in 2026. These reports emphasize that a need for assistance must not be confused with diminished personhood or the loss of entitlement to human rights (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026a; 2026b).

These findings concern a broader question within international human rights law: how universal rights can be translated into specific obligations where the circumstances of a group expose recurring legal and institutional barriers. The proposed convention could provide greater clarity, but its effectiveness would depend on the precise rights and duties governments ultimately establish.

3.1 Existing Protections Under International Human Rights Law

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights protects older persons through guarantees concerning life, liberty, privacy, equality before the law, and participation in public affairs. Article 26 establishes a general right to equality before the law and equal protection without discrimination. Although age is not expressly identified among its enumerated grounds, the Human Rights Committee has interpreted the provision as capable of encompassing age-based distinctions.

In Love et al. v. Australia, Communication No. 983/2001, the Committee considered complaints by airline pilots affected by a compulsory retirement age of 60. It examined whether the age distinction was objectively and reasonably justified, taking account of the aviation safety considerations presented. In its Views adopted on March 25, 2003, the Committee found no violation of Article 26. The decision demonstrates that age-based distinctions can fall within the provision's protection without making every such distinction unlawful (Human Rights Committee, 2003).

The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights provides guarantees of particular significance in older age. Article 9 recognizes the right to social security, Article 11 concerns an adequate standard of living, and Article 12 recognizes the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Article 2 establishes obligations concerning implementation and non-discrimination, including progressive realization of Covenant rights to the maximum of available resources (United Nations, 1966).

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights addressed older persons specifically in General Comment No. 6 of 1995. It examined economic security, employment, housing, health, education, and participation in cultural life. General Comment No. 20 of 2009 subsequently identified age as falling within the Covenant's prohibition of discrimination based on other status. These General Comments provide treaty-body interpretations, although they are not amendments to the Covenant (CESCR, 1995; 2009).

Age is expressly included in some specialized universal treaties. Articles 1(1) and 7 of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families identify age among the prohibited grounds of discrimination. These provisions apply within the scope of that convention, demonstrating that express protection against age discrimination already exists in a particular global treaty regime without establishing a general convention for all older persons (United Nations, 1990).

Other instruments address circumstances that can affect older individuals. CEDAW General Recommendation No. 27 examines discrimination against older women, including disadvantages associated with employment, pensions, property, and health care. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities protects older persons who fall within its scope, including through provisions concerning legal capacity, independent living, accessibility, and health. Older age and disability remain distinct legal categories, even where the protections overlap (CEDAW Committee, 2010; United Nations, 2006).

3.2 The Limits of General Human Rights Guarantees

Universal treaties establish the legal basis for many claims involving older persons, but their provisions often require further interpretation when applied to age-specific circumstances. The right to health does not, by itself, determine every aspect of a state's responsibilities concerning geriatric services, long-term care, or palliative treatment. Similarly, guarantees of liberty and privacy require application to particular circumstances involving involuntary placement or coercive practices in residential institutions.

The 2022 OHCHR report identified several areas where international standards remained insufficiently specific or their implementation was inadequate. These included legal capacity, care arrangements, protection against violence, housing, access to remedies, and the consequences of digital exclusion. The difficulties are not confined to the absence of formal legal guarantees. They also concern whether governments and service providers understand the obligations arising from those guarantees.

The Independent Expert's 2026 report on autonomy, dignity, and human rights in situations of dependency, A/81/177, develops this analysis. It identifies barriers that arise when legal and institutional arrangements equate a person's need for assistance with an inability to exercise rights. The report emphasizes the importance of support arrangements that respect individual preferences, communication, participation, and independent decision-making (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026b).

A specialized convention could clarify the legal implications of these findings. More specific provisions might address informed consent, residential care, age discrimination, independent living, and effective remedies. A dedicated monitoring mechanism could also encourage sustained attention to circumstances that receive inconsistent treatment across existing human rights bodies.

Such measures would not necessarily resolve failures caused by inadequate domestic legislation, insufficient resources, or ineffective enforcement. Existing treaty bodies already possess authority to examine many of these questions under their respective instruments. The legal justification for a new convention must consequently rest on the additional clarity, coverage, and accountability it could provide, rather than an assumption that older persons presently lack fundamental human rights.

4. From International Ageing Policy to Treaty Negotiations

International concern with older persons developed through policy initiatives long before formal treaty negotiations began. The first World Assembly on Ageing, held in Vienna in 1982, adopted the Vienna International Plan of Action on Ageing. It addressed social and economic circumstances associated with population aging, including health, housing, income security, and participation. The Plan provided guidance to governments but did not establish a comprehensive international human rights treaty.

The United Nations General Assembly adopted the United Nations Principles for Older Persons through Resolution 46/91 on December 16, 1991. The 18 principles were organized around independence, participation, care, self-fulfillment, and dignity. They recognized the importance of appropriate support, opportunities for social participation, and respect for individual autonomy. Although non-binding, the principles helped establish terminology and expectations that influenced subsequent international discussions (United Nations General Assembly, 1991).

The Second World Assembly on Ageing, held in Madrid in 2002, adopted the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing and an accompanying Political Declaration. The framework addressed older persons and development, health and well-being, and supportive environments. It also recognized the relationship between population aging and policies concerning employment, pensions, health care, and community participation. These commitments established international policy objectives rather than directly enforceable treaty obligations.

A more explicitly legal process began in 2010 when General Assembly Resolution 65/182 established the Open-ended Working Group on Ageing. Its mandate concerned weaknesses in international human rights protection and possible measures to address them. In 2013, the Human Rights Council established the mandate of the Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons through Resolution 24/20. The Independent Expert's work contributed to the assessment of discrimination, institutional care, autonomy, and other protection gaps (United Nations General Assembly, 2010; Human Rights Council, 2013).

The Open-ended Working Group on Ageing subsequently examined these questions over 14 sessions. At its final session in May 2024, it adopted Decision 14/1, which identified possible measures to address gaps in international protection, including the development of a legally binding instrument. The General Assembly acknowledged completion of the group's work through Resolution 78/324 in August 2024 and formally concluded its mandate through Resolution 79/147 later that year.

Human Rights Council Resolution 58/13 established a different institutional mandate in April 2025. The earlier working group had examined deficiencies and possible responses; the new intergovernmental body was expressly tasked with preparing a draft treaty. The distinction marks the transition from considering whether a specialized instrument might be useful to negotiating its possible legal content.

The development also reflects a change in the international treatment of older persons. Earlier initiatives frequently concentrated on demographic change, welfare provision, and the economic consequences of aging. The proposed convention places greater emphasis on older individuals as rights holders whose autonomy, equality, and participation require legal protection. Social policy remains relevant, but the treaty process requires governments to determine which standards should become binding international obligations.

5. Rights the Proposed Convention Could Protect

The substantive content of the proposed convention remains under negotiation. Discussions concern civil and political rights, economic and social guarantees, and protections against particular forms of abuse and exclusion. Several potential provisions would clarify rights already recognized under international law, while others could establish additional standards or more specific implementation duties.

Equality, legal capacity, personal liberty, health, social security, and access to justice are established human rights under applicable treaties. Their inclusion in a specialized convention could give greater precision to obligations affecting older persons, particularly where existing standards have received limited age-related interpretation. This would require careful attention to the relationship between the new instrument and treaties already binding on participating states.

Other questions remain less settled. These include whether the convention will recognize an autonomous right to care, prescribe detailed standards for long-term support, or establish new procedures for individual complaints. No final catalogue of rights has been adopted. The subjects addressed in negotiations must consequently be distinguished from provisions that governments have agreed to make legally binding.

5.1 Equality and Protection Against Age Discrimination

Age discrimination arises when age becomes an unjustified basis for restricting or disadvantaging a person in the enjoyment of rights. It may occur through explicit rules or through apparently neutral requirements that disproportionately disadvantage particular age groups. Employment restrictions, unequal access to services, medical decisions, and exclusion from public participation are among the circumstances in which age-based distinctions may require legal scrutiny.

The World Health Organization's Global Report on Ageism, published in 2021 with contributions from other United Nations entities, identified ageism as a widespread social and institutional problem. Survey evidence involving 83,034 respondents across 57 countries indicated that approximately half held moderately or highly ageist attitudes. The estimate concerns stereotypes and prejudice; it does not establish that half of older persons had personally experienced unlawful discrimination (WHO et al., 2021).

Existing international law already prohibits unjustified age discrimination under applicable treaty provisions, but a specialized convention could establish clearer obligations. Such provisions might address direct discrimination, where age is an express ground for unfavorable treatment, and indirect discrimination, where a formally neutral rule produces unjustified disadvantages. They could also clarify when positive measures or adjustments are required to secure substantive equality.

International law does not prohibit every distinction based on age. Eligibility criteria may pursue legitimate objectives, including occupational safety or the administration of social protection systems. Under ICCPR Article 26, the assessment of differential treatment includes whether the distinction rests on reasonable and objective grounds. The Human Rights Committee's reasoning in Love et al. v. Australia illustrates why unequal treatment and unlawful discrimination are not necessarily equivalent.

Discrimination may also involve several characteristics simultaneously. Older women can experience disadvantages associated with unequal lifetime earnings, interrupted employment, unpaid caregiving, and inadequate pension entitlements. Older migrants, persons with disabilities, and individuals living in poverty may encounter additional obstacles to services and remedies. A comprehensive convention could address these intersecting circumstances without treating older persons as a uniform social or legal category.

5.2 Autonomy, Legal Capacity, and Independent Living

Personal autonomy concerns the ability to make decisions about one's life, including health care, living arrangements, property, relationships, and participation in society. Older age does not itself remove legal capacity or justify restrictions on personal freedom. Nevertheless, assumptions concerning dependence or cognitive decline may influence decisions taken by families, health professionals, care institutions, and public authorities.

Legal capacity must be distinguished from the practical ability to perform particular tasks without assistance. An individual may require communication support, medical assistance, or help with daily activities while retaining the right to participate in decisions affecting their life. Treating the need for assistance as automatic evidence of incapacity risks replacing personal preferences with decisions imposed by others.

Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities provides an important framework concerning equal recognition before the law and support in exercising legal capacity. Article 19 addresses independent living and inclusion in the community. These provisions are relevant to older persons who fall within the Convention's scope, although the relationship between disability, decision-making assessments, and protective arrangements remains contested in some legal systems (United Nations, 2006).

The Independent Expert's 2026 report on cognitive impairment and the continuing exercise of human rights, A/HRC/63/35, examines the risks created when changes in memory, communication, or cognition are treated as sufficient reasons to disregard individual choices. It emphasizes that cognitive impairment does not extinguish personhood or human rights. Appropriate support may involve accessible information, adapted communication, additional time, and attention to the person's will and preferences (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026a).

The related report on autonomy and dignity in situations of dependency, A/81/177, rejects the assumption that reliance on assistance necessarily diminishes agency. Its analysis distinguishes the circumstances requiring support from the legal and institutional arrangements through which that support is provided. The report identifies the risk that protective interventions may undermine autonomy when they rely on generalized assumptions rather than an individual's circumstances and expressed preferences (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026b).

Medical consent illustrates the relationship between autonomy and effective safeguards. An older person may be entitled to receive information about available treatment, assess its consequences, and accept or refuse an intervention under applicable law. Where decision-making support is necessary, it should assist the person in expressing and exercising their choices without treating age alone as a justification for substituted decisions.

Residential care raises similar concerns. Involuntary placement, restrictions on movement, or limitations on contact with family and community may interfere with liberty, privacy, and independent living. The legality of such measures depends on the applicable rights and the circumstances of each case. A future convention could clarify protective safeguards without presuming that older persons requiring assistance must surrender control over their living arrangements.

5.3 Health, Long-Term Care, and the Right to Care

Access to health care and continuing support is among the principal substantive questions facing the treaty negotiations. Article 12 of the ICESCR recognizes the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Its application to older persons requires attention to availability, accessibility, affordability, quality, and non-discrimination. A dedicated convention could clarify how existing obligations apply to age-related barriers, rehabilitation, continuing treatment, and palliative care.

Long-term care presents additional legal questions because it may involve assistance with daily activities, housing, personal support, and social services over extended periods. Some individuals receive assistance at home or through community arrangements, while others rely on residential institutions. The form and conditions of care can affect autonomy, relationships, privacy, and freedom of movement.

An autonomous right to care would require a precise legal definition. It might encompass access to appropriate services, safeguards against neglect, and support for individuals who provide care. Depending on its wording, it could create obligations concerning public provision, financing, regulation, or supervision of care services. The negotiations have not established which of these responsibilities will be included in the global instrument.

Caregiving also raises questions about the distribution of responsibilities between governments, families, communities, and private institutions. Informal care is frequently performed by relatives whose unpaid responsibilities can affect employment, income, and social security. Recognizing the rights of care recipients without examining the conditions of caregivers may leave significant inequalities unresolved. The Inter-American Court's 2025 Advisory Opinion OC-31/25 provides a regional judicial interpretation of these interconnected interests.

The Independent Expert's 2026 report on dependency emphasizes the importance of organizing support around the individual's wishes and rights. It identifies community-based assistance, accessible communication, and meaningful participation as important conditions for preserving autonomy. Institutional care may remain necessary or appropriate for some individuals, but its availability does not eliminate the need for safeguards, oversight, and respect for personal choices (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026b).

Palliative care and end-of-life decisions require particular legal attention. Protection of dignity may involve pain management, appropriate treatment, informed consent, and safeguards against abandonment or unnecessary suffering. The relevant obligations must be assessed under applicable health, equality, liberty, and other human rights guarantees. Older age alone provides no justification for denying treatment or disregarding a person's legally protected preferences.

5.4 Social Security, Employment, and Participation

Economic security affects the ability of older persons to maintain independence, obtain adequate housing, access health care, and participate in society. Article 9 of the ICESCR recognizes the right to social security, while Article 11 protects an adequate standard of living. These provisions provide a legal basis for evaluating the accessibility and adequacy of social protection under the obligations applicable to states parties.

Old-age pensions are especially significant because eligibility and benefit levels may depend on employment histories and contribution requirements. People who have spent substantial periods in informal employment or unpaid caregiving may receive limited contributory benefits. Older women can be disproportionately affected where lifetime inequalities have reduced earnings and pension accumulation. Non-contributory benefits may address some of these deficiencies, although their design remains subject to applicable legal standards and national circumstances.

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has addressed the situation of older persons in its interpretation of the Covenant. General Comment No. 6 examines income security, work, housing, health, and participation. General Comment No. 19, concerning the right to social security, further develops the requirements associated with social protection, including accessibility and adequacy. These interpretations help clarify existing obligations without establishing a separate universal convention on older persons (CESCR, 1995; 2008).

Employment rights remain relevant beyond conventional retirement ages. Older individuals may wish or need to continue working but encounter restrictive recruitment practices, compulsory retirement rules, or exclusion from professional development. International standards must distinguish unjustified discrimination from age-based requirements that satisfy the applicable legal test. The circumstances of the occupation and the purpose of a restriction are relevant to that assessment.

Participation extends beyond employment. Older persons retain rights concerning public affairs, political participation, association, education, and cultural life. Barriers may arise through inaccessible transportation, restrictive institutional arrangements, or public services that fail to accommodate different physical and communication needs. A specialized treaty could clarify the measures required to secure meaningful participation.

Digital exclusion presents additional difficulties. Public benefits, banking, health appointments, and administrative procedures increasingly depend on electronic systems. Older persons who lack accessible technology or appropriate assistance may encounter barriers to services they are otherwise entitled to receive. The Independent Expert's 2026 report on dependency recommends accessible digital and administrative environments and appropriate non-digital alternatives where necessary (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026b).

5.5 Freedom from Abuse and Access to Justice

Protection against violence, exploitation, and neglect is central to the human rights of older persons. Abuse may occur in families, communities, residential institutions, or other environments where individuals receive assistance. It can involve physical violence, psychological mistreatment, financial exploitation, unlawful deprivation of liberty, or failures to provide necessary care.

Existing human rights obligations may require states to take appropriate measures against serious harm, including abuses committed by private actors. The applicable duties depend on the right concerned, the state's knowledge of relevant risks, and the legal standard governing preventive or investigative action. A specialized convention could establish more explicit responsibilities concerning the prevention of abuse, institutional supervision, and access to protective services.

Financial exploitation presents particular difficulties. Older individuals may experience fraudulent transfers, coercion involving property, misuse of financial authority, or pressure to surrender control over income and assets. Protective arrangements must respect legal capacity and autonomy. Restrictions imposed to prevent exploitation can themselves violate rights if they are unjustified or unnecessarily extensive.

Access to justice determines whether protective guarantees can be exercised effectively. Older persons may face inaccessible procedures, financial constraints, communication barriers, or difficulties obtaining legal assistance. Institutional residents may depend on organizations or personnel against whom complaints must be made. Effective protection may require accessible proceedings, independent oversight, appropriate investigation, and remedies that can address violations before irreparable harm occurs.

The Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions examined these concerns in report A/81/215, issued in July 2026. The report addresses the documentation, investigation, and prevention of potentially unlawful deaths of older persons. It considers how age discrimination, institutional neglect, and inadequate investigative practices can obscure serious violations of the right to life, particularly in care settings and situations involving deprivation of liberty (Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, 2026).

Armed conflicts, disasters, displacement, and humanitarian emergencies can create additional risks. Older persons may encounter difficulties evacuating, obtaining medication, accessing assistance, or maintaining family support. International humanitarian law and applicable human rights treaties already provide relevant protections. A future convention could clarify age-responsive measures without assuming that older age automatically establishes a distinct legal status under the law of armed conflict.

6. Existing Regional Treaties on the Rights of Older Persons

Regional human rights systems have already developed legal instruments specifically addressing older persons. Binding treaties in the Americas and Africa provide examples of how general human rights guarantees can be supplemented by provisions concerning autonomy, age discrimination, care, social protection, and access to justice. European instruments contain additional protections, although their legal scope and institutional arrangements differ.

These regional approaches provide concrete models for the United Nations negotiations. Some instruments establish comprehensive catalogues of rights, while others incorporate protections for older persons into broader regional human rights systems. Their definitions, implementation requirements, and supervision procedures demonstrate that specialized protection can take several legal forms.

Regional obligations do not automatically become universal legal rules. Treaty participation, jurisdiction, and the powers of supervisory institutions determine the obligations applicable within each system. A future United Nations convention could draw upon regional experience while adopting different substantive provisions or institutional arrangements.

6.1 The Inter-American Convention and the Right to Care

The Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons was adopted by the Organization of American States on June 15, 2015, and entered into force on January 11, 2017. It establishes a comprehensive regional framework addressing equality, independence, autonomy, health, social protection, long-term care, and access to justice. Its provisions are legally binding on states parties under the conditions established by the convention (OAS, 2015).

Article 2 generally defines an older person as someone aged 60 or above, subject to national legislation establishing a lower or higher minimum age, provided that the threshold does not exceed 65 years. Article 5 expressly prohibits discrimination based on age in older age. Article 7 recognizes independence and autonomy, including the ability to make decisions and determine personal life plans.

Article 11 establishes protections concerning free and informed consent in health-related matters. Article 12 addresses the rights of older persons receiving long-term care and requires safeguards concerning the quality of services, institutional conditions, and respect for personal autonomy. These provisions provide detailed examples of obligations that go beyond a general declaration of equality.

A further legal development occurred in 2025 when the Inter-American Court of Human Rights adopted Advisory Opinion OC-31/25, The Content and Scope of Care as a Human Right and Its Interrelationship with Other Rights. Requested by Argentina, the opinion was adopted on June 12 and notified on August 7, 2025. The Court recognized an autonomous human right to care within the applicable Inter-American legal framework and examined its relationship with other protected rights (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 2025).

The Court identified three related dimensions of care: receiving care, providing care, and self-care. Its interpretation recognizes that care arrangements affect the rights of those requiring assistance and those who provide it. The opinion also addresses the relationship between care, equality, autonomy, and the unequal distribution of caregiving responsibilities.

The advisory opinion represents a significant development in regional human rights jurisprudence, but its authority must be understood within the Inter-American system. It is not a judgment of the International Court of Justice and does not establish an identically defined autonomous right to care as a universally binding treaty obligation. Its relevance to the United Nations negotiations lies in providing a developed legal interpretation that governments may consider when formulating future treaty provisions.

6.2 African and European Approaches to Older Persons' Rights

The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights already recognizes special protection for older persons under Article 18(4). The African Union subsequently adopted the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Older Persons in Africa on January 31, 2016. The Protocol entered into force on November 6, 2024, following the required ratifications, establishing a specialized regional treaty framework for its states parties (African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, 2024).

Article 1 of the Protocol defines older persons as individuals aged 60 years and above. Its substantive provisions address dignity, independence, protection against abuse, health care, social protection, and participation. Articles 10 and 11 concern care and support, including family assistance and residential care. Article 14 addresses protection and assistance in conflict and disaster situations, while Article 15 concerns access to health services (African Union, 2016).

The African instrument also recognizes circumstances in which older persons themselves provide care. Article 12 addresses support for older persons caring for orphans and vulnerable children. This provision reflects the diversity of older people's responsibilities and avoids treating them exclusively as recipients of assistance. It also illustrates how regional social circumstances can influence the content of international legal obligations.

European instruments provide a different combination of protections. Article 23 of the Revised European Social Charter recognizes the right of elderly persons to social protection. It concerns adequate resources, access to services, independent living, appropriate housing, and safeguards for people residing in institutions. The obligations apply within the European Social Charter system, taking account of whether the relevant state has accepted Article 23 (Council of Europe, 1996).

The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union contains additional provisions. Article 21 expressly prohibits discrimination on grounds including age. Article 25 recognizes and respects the dignity, independence, and social and cultural participation of older persons. However, the official explanations to the Charter identify Article 25 as a provision containing a principle, whose judicial recognition is governed by Article 52(5).

That distinction affects the provision's legal operation. Charter principles are relevant to the interpretation and review of implementing measures but do not automatically establish independent claims requiring positive action by EU institutions or national authorities. Article 51 further limits the Charter's application to EU institutions and to member states when implementing Union law. Article 25 cannot consequently be treated as creating an unrestricted European Union competence over national pension, housing, or care systems (European Union, 2007; 2012).

The regional comparison demonstrates several approaches to protecting older persons through international law. The Inter-American Convention provides an extensive catalogue of rights and dedicated implementation arrangements. The African Protocol develops protections already recognized under the African Charter, while European instruments combine age discrimination guarantees with social protection principles. Their different approaches to definitions, duties, and supervision remain relevant to the unresolved questions facing the United Nations negotiations.

7. Legal Obligations Under a Future Convention

A future convention could establish binding obligations concerning the treatment of older persons, but its legal effects would depend on the provisions ultimately adopted and the participation of individual states. Governments would not necessarily assume identical obligations at the same time. The treaty's final clauses would determine matters such as entry into force, consent to be bound, and any arrangements concerning reservations or declarations.

International human rights obligations are commonly analyzed through duties to respect, protect, and fulfill rights. The duty to respect requires public authorities to refrain from conduct that unlawfully interferes with protected rights. The duty to protect can require states to address abuses by private actors, while the duty to fulfill concerns measures necessary to enable the effective enjoyment of rights. The precise content of these duties depends on the applicable treaty provisions and their interpretation.

For older persons, such obligations could have consequences across health care, employment, social protection, housing, institutional regulation, and judicial administration. An express prohibition of unjustified age discrimination might require revisions to domestic eligibility rules or administrative practices. Obligations concerning abuse and long-term care could require stronger regulation of public and private providers. Social rights provisions might influence the accessibility and adequacy of essential services.

The distinction between establishing rights and securing compliance is fundamental. A treaty can clarify legal standards and create international accountability mechanisms, but it cannot guarantee their effective implementation. Domestic legislation, functioning institutions, adequate resources, and access to remedies remain necessary. The eventual convention would need to address these requirements without confusing international obligations with the particular administrative arrangements through which states may fulfill them.

7.1 Domestic Implementation and Resource Obligations

Domestic implementation could require states parties to review legislation and administrative practices affecting older persons. Relevant areas include anti-discrimination law, medical consent, guardianship, care institutions, pensions, employment, and access to public services. Governments might need to identify legal provisions that unjustifiably restrict rights on grounds of age and establish effective procedures through which individuals can challenge unlawful treatment.

Health and long-term care regulation could become an important field of implementation. States might be required to establish or strengthen inspection systems, licensing standards, complaints procedures, and measures addressing neglect or abuse. Public authorities could also assume more specific obligations concerning private care providers. The scope of such duties would depend on the final treaty and the obligations already applicable under existing international human rights law.

International obligations do not automatically operate as directly enforceable rules in every national legal system. Domestic constitutional arrangements determine how treaties are incorporated, interpreted, and applied by courts and administrative authorities. Some legal systems permit individuals to invoke treaty provisions directly in specified circumstances, while others require implementing legislation. The relationship between international law and municipal law can consequently affect the practical availability of remedies.

Economic and social obligations raise additional questions concerning public resources. Under Article 2(1) of the ICESCR, states parties undertake to take steps, to the maximum of their available resources, toward progressively achieving the full realization of Covenant rights. Article 2(2) separately establishes an obligation concerning non-discrimination. These provisions illustrate how international human rights law can distinguish immediate obligations from measures involving progressive realization (United Nations, 1966).

Progressive realization does not make economic and social rights optional. States parties remain subject to applicable duties concerning appropriate steps, non-discrimination, and the justification of measures affecting protected rights. Resource constraints may influence how certain obligations are implemented, but they do not provide a general exemption from international human rights law. A future convention would need to determine whether and how comparable standards apply to care, housing, social security, and other economic and social guarantees.

Existing regional treaties offer examples of how these distinctions can be expressed. Article 4 of the Inter-American Convention requires legislative, administrative, judicial, budgetary, and other measures to give effect to protected rights. It also addresses progressive realization of economic, social, and cultural rights, while preserving obligations that are immediately applicable under international law. Such provisions provide possible models without predetermining the content of the United Nations instrument (OAS, 2015).

The participation of older persons could also become a significant implementation requirement. National human rights institutions and representative organizations may contribute to legislative review, monitoring, data collection, and policy development. Their involvement can help identify barriers that are not apparent from general administrative statistics. Effective participation requires accessible procedures and genuine opportunities to influence decisions concerning rights and services.

7.2 International Monitoring and Individual Complaints

International supervision remains an unresolved element of the proposed convention. Existing United Nations human rights treaties use different monitoring arrangements, commonly involving committees of independent experts that examine state reports and issue concluding observations. Some treaty regimes also provide individual communications, inquiries, or other procedures when the relevant legal conditions have been satisfied.

A future convention could establish a dedicated monitoring body responsible for examining periodic reports from states parties. Such a procedure might require governments to explain legislative developments, administrative measures, and difficulties encountered in implementing treaty obligations. Independent experts could evaluate this information and issue recommendations. National human rights institutions and civil society organizations might contribute evidence concerning national practices.

The Inter-American Convention provides an existing example of specialized supervision. Articles 33–35 establish a follow-up mechanism comprising a Conference of States Parties and a Committee of Experts. The convention provides for the mechanism to be established upon deposit of the tenth instrument of ratification or accession. Its functions include reviewing implementation, examining periodic state reports, issuing recommendations, and promoting cooperation among participating governments (OAS, 2015).

Article 36 establishes a separate system of individual petitions to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights concerning alleged violations by states parties. It also provides for declarations recognizing the Commission's competence concerning interstate communications and for optional acceptance of the Inter-American Court's contentious jurisdiction under the convention. These arrangements demonstrate why monitoring, individual petitions, and international judicial jurisdiction must be distinguished.

A United Nations convention could adopt a different institutional model. Individual complaints might be authorized under the treaty itself, through an optional protocol, or through another agreed procedure. Such mechanisms normally require rules concerning jurisdiction, admissibility, and the relationship with domestic remedies. Ratification of a substantive human rights convention does not automatically establish access to every form of international review.

The legal character of international findings also differs among institutions. Treaty-body Views and concluding observations are not equivalent to binding judgments issued by international courts exercising accepted jurisdiction. Their authority and legal consequences depend on the applicable treaty framework. A future convention would need to specify the powers assigned to its monitoring institutions and the procedures available to individuals.

Supervision has financial and administrative implications. Another treaty body could require additional personnel, reporting arrangements, accessibility measures, translation, and institutional support. Governments must consider these demands in light of existing resource constraints within the international human rights system. The October 2026 negotiations recognized implementation and monitoring as a separate area requiring further agreement.

A dedicated mechanism might nevertheless provide more sustained attention to rights that currently receive inconsistent examination across several treaty systems. It could develop specialized expertise concerning age discrimination, institutional care, autonomy, and social protection. Its effectiveness would depend on the authority assigned to it, cooperation by states parties, and the accessibility of its procedures to older persons.

8. Unresolved Questions and the Path to Treaty Adoption

The negotiations must resolve several substantive and institutional questions before governments can agree on a final convention. Among the most fundamental is the definition of an older person. National legislation and regional instruments use different chronological thresholds, often reflecting social protection arrangements, retirement rules, and demographic circumstances. No universal age threshold has been agreed for the proposed United Nations treaty.

The Inter-American Convention generally uses 60 years, subject to limited national variation, while the African Protocol defines older persons as individuals aged 60 and above. These definitions provide established regional models but cannot be assumed to represent the outcome of global negotiations. Governments must determine whether a chronological threshold offers sufficient clarity and whether additional considerations are necessary to address discrimination occurring at different stages of later life.

A definition based exclusively on age could provide predictable coverage but may also produce difficult boundary questions. A definition centered on dependency or support needs would present different problems, particularly if it treated older age as equivalent to disability or diminished capacity. The 2026 reports of the Independent Expert emphasize the diversity of older populations and the importance of distinguishing support needs from legal status (Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, 2026a; 2026b).

The possible recognition of a right to care presents another substantial question. Governments would need to determine whether care should be formulated as an autonomous right, developed through existing health and social protection guarantees, or addressed through several interconnected provisions. Each approach could produce different obligations concerning public services, family support, private institutions, and resource allocation.

The Inter-American Court's Advisory Opinion OC-31/25 provides an important regional interpretation, but it does not settle the content of a universal treaty provision. The distinction between receiving care, providing care, and self-care may assist the negotiations, particularly where competing responsibilities arise. Governments must still determine which duties are appropriate for a global convention and how those duties would interact with existing international obligations.

The relationship between autonomy and protection also requires careful formulation. States may be expected to prevent neglect, exploitation, and abuse while respecting personal decisions that others regard as unwise or risky. Excessively protective arrangements can interfere with legal capacity, freedom of residence, and personal liberty. Treaty provisions must be capable of identifying unlawful restrictions without assuming that all older persons require substituted decision-making or institutional supervision.

There are also differences among governments concerning the need for a dedicated convention. Supporters argue that existing standards have not provided sufficiently coherent protection and that a specialized treaty could clarify obligations and improve international monitoring. The 2022 OHCHR report provides an institutional basis for this position by identifying normative and implementation gaps across several areas of human rights protection.

Other governments have questioned whether an additional treaty would provide sufficient legal benefits beyond existing instruments. Norway's statement to the intergovernmental working group on October 26, 2026, illustrates a more cautious position. Norway acknowledged the human rights challenges facing older persons but emphasized the need to demonstrate the added value of a new convention, avoid unnecessary duplication, and consider the resource constraints affecting existing international monitoring institutions (Permanent Mission of Norway, 2026).

Norway also raised concerns about the allocation of public resources between age groups and the relationship between international obligations and national democratic decision-making. Its statement emphasized differences among national welfare systems and economic circumstances. Norway had not adopted a definitive position on the creation of a new convention, making its intervention an example of reservations about treaty design rather than categorical opposition.

These concerns identify a genuine question in international human rights law. More detailed treaty provisions can clarify legal duties, but additional legal instruments do not necessarily improve compliance where implementation failures are persistent. Conversely, reliance exclusively on existing treaties may leave age-specific questions insufficiently addressed. The negotiations must determine which deficiencies require new binding standards and which can be addressed through stronger application of existing obligations.

The procedural timetable remains subject to further decisions. Following the October 2026 session, the incoming Brazilian chairmanship and the appointed co-facilitators were expected to advance consultations on the five negotiating areas during 2027. The proposed arrangements included written contributions, discussions between formal sessions, and preparation of preliminary treaty language.

A third substantive session was expected in July 2027, with the development of a zero draft envisaged later that year. These milestones reflected the proposed negotiating process rather than a binding commitment to complete the treaty by a specified date. Agreement on the substantive provisions, implementation arrangements, and institutional design would still be required (GANHRI, 2026).

Even completion of a draft would not necessarily result in immediate adoption. Governments would need to agree on the final instrument and the procedure through which it would be adopted. Signature, ratification, accession, and entry into force are legally distinct stages, each governed by the relevant treaty provisions and applicable international law.

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides the general framework for understanding these distinctions. Article 11 identifies recognized means through which states may express consent to be bound, while Article 24 addresses entry into force. Article 18 establishes a limited obligation concerning a treaty's object and purpose in specified circumstances before entry into force. That obligation must not be confused with the full implementation of a treaty that has entered into force (United Nations, 1969).

No final text of the proposed UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons had been adopted as of November 8, 2026, and no definitive date for entry into force had been established. The negotiations had reached the stage of developing substantive proposals and preparing for more detailed drafting. Whether those efforts produce a comprehensive convention, and how widely it is accepted, will depend on agreements reached during subsequent sessions.

Conclusion

The proposed UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons seeks to establish clearer international legal standards for protecting human rights in older age. Its justification rests on deficiencies identified in the application and specificity of existing protections, particularly concerning age discrimination, personal autonomy, long-term care, abuse, and access to remedies. A dedicated treaty could address these deficiencies through more explicit obligations and specialized supervision.

Existing international human rights law already protects older persons. The proposed convention would operate alongside those obligations rather than replace them. Regional experience demonstrates that specialized treaties can define rights and state responsibilities in considerable detail, although their implementation remains dependent on state participation, domestic institutions, and effective monitoring.

The October 2026 negotiations established a more developed basis for drafting a global instrument, but major decisions remain unresolved. Governments must still determine the scope of protected rights, the content of care-related obligations, the definition of older persons, and the institutional arrangements necessary for accountability.

The decisive legal question is whether a dedicated convention can improve the protection of older persons beyond what existing treaties already require. Its eventual contribution will depend less on the existence of another international instrument than on the precision of its provisions, the obligations states accept, and the capacity of national and international institutions to give those obligations practical effect.

References

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (1981) Adopted 27 June 1981; entered into force 21 October 1986. Organization of African Unity. Available at: https://achpr.au.int/index.php/en/charter/african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (2024) Final Communiqué of the 81st Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights [online]. Available at: https://achpr.au.int/sw/node/4144 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

African Union (2016) Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Older Persons in Africa. Adopted 31 January 2016; entered into force 6 November 2024. Available at: https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36438-treaty-0051_-_protocol_on_the_rights_of_older_persons_e.pdf (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1995) General Comment No. 6: The Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of Older Persons. E/1996/22, Annex IV, 8 December 1995. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/1995/27839 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2008) General Comment No. 19: The Right to Social Security (Art. 9). E/C.12/GC/19, 4 February 2008. Available at: https://docs.un.org/E/C.12/GC/19 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2009) General Comment No. 20: Non-discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Art. 2, Para. 2, of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). E/C.12/GC/20, 2 July 2009. Available at: https://docs.un.org/E/C.12/GC/20 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (2010) General Recommendation No. 27 on Older Women and Protection of Their Human Rights. CEDAW/C/GC/27, 16 December 2010. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/711348/ (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Council of Europe (1996) European Social Charter (Revised). Strasbourg, 3 May 1996; entered into force 1 July 1999. European Treaty Series No. 163. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en-GB/web/conventions/full-list2?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=163 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

European Union (2007) Explanations Relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Official Journal of the European Union, C 303, 14 December 2007, pp. 17–35. 2007/C 303/02. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32007X1214(01) (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

European Union (2012) Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 26 October 2012, pp. 391–407. 2012/C 326/02. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) (2026) NHRIs Help Shape a Future Treaty on the Human Rights of Older Persons [online]. 30 October 2026. Available at: https://ganhri.org/nhris-help-shape-a-future-treaty-on-the-human-rights-of-older-persons/ (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Human Rights Committee (2003) Love et al. v. Australia. Views adopted 25 March 2003, Communication No. 983/2001, CCPR/C/77/D/983/2001. Available at: https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1044/en-US (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Human Rights Council (2013) The Human Rights of Older Persons. Resolution 24/20, A/HRC/RES/24/20, adopted 27 September 2013. Available at: https://docs.un.org/A/HRC/RES/24/20 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Human Rights Council (2025) Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group for the Elaboration of a Legally Binding Instrument on the Promotion and Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons. Resolution 58/13, A/HRC/RES/58/13, adopted 3 April 2025. Available at: https://searchlibrary.ohchr.org/record/31957 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of All Human Rights by Older Persons (2026a) Cognitive Impairment and the Continuing Exercise of Human Rights by Older Persons. Report of Zvezdan Pirtošek to the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/63/35, 5 August 2026. Available at: https://docs.un.org/A/HRC/63/35 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of All Human Rights by Older Persons (2026b) Autonomy, Dignity, and the Enjoyment of Human Rights in Situations of Dependency in Older Age. Report of Zvezdan Pirtošek to the General Assembly, A/81/177, 14 July 2026. Available at: https://docs.un.org/A/81/177 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2025) The Content and Scope of Care as a Human Right and Its Interrelationship with Other Rights. Advisory Opinion OC-31/25, adopted 12 June 2025, notified 7 August 2025. Available at: https://corteidh.or.cr/OC-31-2025/index-eng.html (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) Adopted 16 December 1966; entered into force 23 March 1976. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/ccpr.pdf (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2022) Normative Standards and Obligations under International Law in Relation to the Promotion and Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/49/70, 28 January 2022. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3958823 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Organization of American States (2015) Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons. Adopted 15 June 2015; entered into force 11 January 2017. OAS Treaty Series A-70. Available at: https://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/inter_american_treaties_A-70_human_rights_older_persons.asp (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Permanent Mission of Norway in Geneva (2026) Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group for the Elaboration of a Legally Binding Instrument on the Promotion and Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons: Statement by Norway [online]. 26 October 2026. Available at: https://www.norway.no/en/missions/wto-un/nig/statements/hr/other/20262/igwg/ (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions (2026) Documenting, Investigating and Preventing the Arbitrary Deprivation of Life of Older Persons. Report of Morris Tidball-Binz to the General Assembly, A/81/215, 17 July 2026. Available at: https://docs.un.org/A/81/215 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (1966) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Adopted 16 December 1966; entered into force 3 January 1976. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?chapter=4&clang=_en&mtdsg_no=IV-3&src=IND (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (1969) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Concluded at Vienna, 23 May 1969; entered into force 27 January 1980. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/pages/showdetails.aspx?objid=080000028003902f (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (1982) Vienna International Plan of Action on Ageing. Adopted at the World Assembly on Ageing, Vienna, 6 August 1982. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/conferences/ageing/vienna1982 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (1990) International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. Adopted 18 December 1990; entered into force 1 July 2003. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 2220, p. 3. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?chapter=4&clang=_en&mtdsg_no=iv-13&src=treaty (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (2002) Political Declaration and Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. Adopted at the Second World Assembly on Ageing, Madrid, April 2002. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/conferences/ageing/madrid2002 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Adopted 13 December 2006; entered into force 3 May 2008. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 2515, p. 3. Available at: https://treaties-prod.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?chapter=4&clang=_en&mtdsg_no=IV-15&src=TREATY (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations (2026) Second Session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Human Rights of Older Persons, 26–30 October 2026 [online]. United Nations Office at Geneva. Available at: https://indico.un.org/event/1019023/ (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations General Assembly (1991) Implementation of the International Plan of Action on Ageing and Related Activities. Resolution 46/91, including the United Nations Principles for Older Persons, A/RES/46/91, adopted 16 December 1991. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/135779 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations General Assembly (2010) Follow-up to the Second World Assembly on Ageing. Resolution 65/182, A/RES/65/182, adopted 21 December 2010. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/697916 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations General Assembly (2024a) Consideration of Decision 14/1 of the Open-ended Working Group on Ageing, Entitled “Recommendations Regarding the Identification of Possible Gaps in the Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons and How Best to Address Them”. Resolution 78/324, A/RES/78/324, adopted 13 August 2024. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4060791 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

United Nations General Assembly (2024b) Follow-up to the Second World Assembly on Ageing. Resolution 79/147, A/RES/79/147, adopted 17 December 2024. Available at: https://docs.un.org/A/RES/79/147 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).

World Health Organization, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Population Fund and Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2021) Global Report on Ageism. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240016866 (Accessed: 8 November 2026).