Can Trump Drill for Oil in Greenland? Who Owns Greenland’s Resources
Introduction
President Donald Trump announced on October 14, 2026, that extensive oil, gas, and mineral exploration was preparing to begin in Greenland, claiming that the island could contain exceptionally large quantities of accessible petroleum. The announcement brought renewed attention to Trump Greenland oil drilling plans and raised questions about American access to the territory's natural resources. Under the existing legal arrangements, however, the United States has no independent authority to drill for oil in Greenland, and the September 2026 defense agreement does not grant American companies automatic exploration or extraction rights (Reuters, 2026b).
Greenland remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, but its government exercises extensive authority over natural resources under the Act on Greenland Self-Government of 2009. Greenlandic legislation expressly assigns Greenland Self-Government the right to dispose of and exploit subsurface mineral resources, including petroleum. Since June 2021, Naalakkersuisut, the Government of Greenland, has maintained a policy against granting new oil and gas exploration licenses, although certain licenses issued before that decision remain legally valid.
The distinction has immediate practical consequences. In eastern Greenland, the Nunap Qeqqa/Jameson Land petroleum project involves American commercial participation under licenses originally granted in 2015 and 2018. Greenlandic authorities have confirmed that the project has not received authorization to begin exploratory drilling. Environmental assessments, public consultation, and further administrative approvals remain necessary before such operations can proceed (Naalakkersuisut, 2026a).
Trump's announcement also followed the September 22, 2026, agreement between the United States, Denmark, and Greenland concerning Arctic defense cooperation. Although the agreement addresses foreign investment in sensitive sectors, including resource extraction, it does not transfer petroleum rights to Washington. The relevant questions concern Greenland's statutory control over its resources, the scope of existing petroleum licenses, and the legal and geological conditions that must be satisfied before exploration can develop into commercial oil production.
1. Trump's October 2026 Oil Drilling Announcement
On October 14, 2026, Trump stated on Truth Social that “massive” oil, gas, and mineral exploration was preparing to begin in Greenland. He also claimed that experts believed the island could contain unusually large quantities of readily accessible petroleum. Reuters reported the announcement on the same day but identified no companies, approved drilling locations, or timetable associated with the proposed activities (Reuters, 2026b).
The claim about accessible petroleum requires particular caution. Greenland has geological formations considered prospective for oil and natural gas, but estimates of undiscovered resources are not equivalent to proven commercial reserves. Nor does the identification of a potentially productive sedimentary basin establish that petroleum can be extracted economically.
Trump's statement followed the agreement signed by Washington, Copenhagen, and Nuuk on September 22, 2026. That instrument expanded the framework for American military cooperation in Greenland while expressly recognizing the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark and the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination (United States, Denmark and Greenland, 2026).
The agreement provides no legal basis for treating Greenland's petroleum deposits as American resources. Its provisions concerning military access and certain foreign investments serve purposes distinct from commercial hydrocarbon licensing. A presidential declaration cannot amend Greenlandic legislation, confer rights over a petroleum field, or replace the administrative decisions required under that legislation.
An existing exploration project involving American investors provides a possible commercial context for renewed interest in Greenlandic oil. Greenland Energy Company has participated in the Jameson Land project through arrangements with 80 Mile PLC, a British company. Nevertheless, the available announcement does not establish that Trump was referring specifically to Jameson Land or that another petroleum project had obtained authorization to begin drilling.
The announcement is consequently more definite about American political ambitions than about the activities that will occur. Its practical significance depends on whether companies possess valid exploration rights, satisfy the relevant regulatory conditions, and identify petroleum deposits that justify further investment.
2. Who Controls Greenland's Oil and Gas Resources?
Greenland occupies a distinctive position under international and constitutional law. It is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark rather than an independent sovereign state. Yet its constitutional arrangements assign substantial legislative and executive responsibilities to Greenlandic institutions, including authority over mineral-resource activities.
This division separates sovereignty over the territory from the domestic legal competence to administer its natural resources. Denmark retains constitutional responsibility for defense, security, and important aspects of foreign affairs. Greenlandic authorities exercise the powers transferred under the Self-Government Act, including the regulation of petroleum exploration and extraction.
The ownership question also has a specific statutory answer. Section 2(1) of Greenland's Mineral Resources Act assigns Greenland Self-Government ownership of the right to dispose of and exploit mineral resources in Greenland's subsoil. Section 5 of the legislation defines mineral resources to include hydrocarbons, encompassing oil and natural gas (Inatsisartut, 2009, §§ 2 and 5, as amended). These provisions distinguish Greenland's legally established resource rights from the limited commercial interests that foreign companies may obtain through licenses.
2.1 The Greenland Self-Government Act of 2009
The Act on Greenland Self-Government, adopted on June 12, 2009, provides the constitutional foundation for Greenland's present division of governmental responsibilities. Section 1 recognizes Inatsisartut as the institution exercising legislative power and Naalakkersuisut as the institution exercising executive power in fields of responsibility assumed by Greenland (Kingdom of Denmark, 2009).
Responsibility for mineral resources was transferred to Greenlandic authorities on January 1, 2010. The transfer enabled Greenland to exercise direct legislative and administrative authority over petroleum exploration, mineral licensing, and associated regulatory decisions within the applicable constitutional arrangements.
The Mineral Resources Act gives this competence practical effect. Section 2(2) requires the relevant mineral-resource activities, including exploration and exploitation, to be conducted under authorization granted by Naalakkersuisut, subject to the statutory provisions and exceptions. A company seeking to explore a petroleum deposit must possess the appropriate legal rights and comply with the conditions governing the proposed activity.
Control over natural resources also has financial consequences. Section 7 of the Self-Government Act provides that revenue from mineral-resource activities accrues to Greenlandic self-government authorities. The provision encompasses specified licensing revenue, taxation associated with resource operations, and certain returns arising from public interests in resource companies.
Section 8 establishes a mechanism for adjusting Denmark's annual financial subsidy when Greenland's mineral-resource revenue exceeds a specified threshold. The original threshold was DKK 75 million, subject to annual indexation, with the subsidy reduced by half the revenue exceeding that amount. The legislation thus connects Greenland's resource income to its wider financial relationship with Denmark without assigning ordinary petroleum licensing authority to Copenhagen.
The constitutional arrangements also recognize the Greenlandic people's right to self-determination. Section 21 of the Self-Government Act establishes a procedure concerning possible independence, including negotiations and the required political approvals. Greenland's present authority over mineral resources, however, does not depend on independence. It already forms part of the existing statutory allocation of responsibilities.
2.2 Does the September 2026 U.S. Agreement Allow Drilling?
The agreement signed on September 22, 2026, amends and supplements the defense arrangements established between the United States and Denmark in 1951. Its principal purpose is to strengthen military cooperation and facilitate American defense activities in Greenland. The agreement does not confer general petroleum exploration or extraction rights on the United States.
Resource extraction appears in the provisions dealing with foreign investment. Article III includes the extraction of resources among the sectors or activities considered potentially sensitive, while Article X addresses certain forms of foreign control, significant influence, and access to nonpublic information that may threaten national security or public order (United States, Denmark and Greenland, 2026).
Article X concerns states and investors from countries outside the specified categories of NATO members, NATO partners, and European Union members. Its restrictions operate under the conditions stated in the agreement and include an exception mechanism through agreement among the parties. Implementation is assigned to Greenland in close cooperation with Danish authorities through applicable investment-screening legislation.
The provision regulates specified security risks associated with foreign participation. It does not establish exclusive American rights to Greenlandic minerals or petroleum, nor does it require Naalakkersuisut to approve an application submitted by an American company. Compliance with investment-screening requirements and possession of a petroleum license are separate legal questions.
The agreement's entry into force must also be distinguished from its signature. Article XII requires completion of the necessary parliamentary procedures and diplomatic notification to the United States. Reuters reported on October 12 that Greenland's Parliament had debated the agreement and that a further reading and vote remained pending (Reuters, 2026a). The available information does not establish completion of the required notification by October 14. Regardless of that procedural status, the agreement contains no provision authorizing commercial oil drilling.
3. Greenland's 2021 Ban on New Oil Licenses
On June 24, 2021, Naalakkersuisut decided to stop granting new licenses for oil and gas exploration. The government attributed the decision to the environmental consequences associated with petroleum development and its intention not to contribute further to the global climate crisis (Mineral Resources Authority, 2022).
The policy represented a restriction on the future expansion of Greenland's hydrocarbon sector. It affected the availability of new petroleum exploration rights but did not automatically terminate licenses granted before the decision. The distinction is essential because Greenland's existing petroleum projects remain subject to a separate set of rights and obligations.
The policy was implemented through subsequent administrative decisions. On September 30, 2022, Greenland's Mineral Resources Authority formally announced the closure of the 2020 open-door licensing procedure for onshore areas of Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula. That procedure had invited applications for exclusive hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation licenses (Mineral Resources Authority, 2022).
The policy is sometimes described as a Greenland oil exploration ban, but that expression is broader than the government's precise legal position. The decision concerns the issuance of new hydrocarbon licenses. It does not establish an absolute statutory prohibition on every exploration activity undertaken under previously granted rights.
Existing licenses continue to operate within their legal terms. Their holders remain responsible for fulfilling the applicable work commitments, environmental requirements, and administrative conditions. Naalakkersuisut has acknowledged that terminating valid licenses may raise questions of expropriation, although the legal consequences of any particular termination would depend on its circumstances and governing rules.
The government's policy also means that foreign investment cannot be treated as a substitute for licensing authority. An American company may acquire a commercial interest in an existing petroleum project through an appropriate transaction, but that interest does not create a new exploration concession or authorize activities beyond the underlying license.
Nor does a valid license provide unconditional permission to drill. Exploration rights identify the legal basis on which an operator may seek to conduct activities within a specified area. Particular operations remain subject to the approvals and conditions required by Greenlandic law.
The 2021 decision could be reconsidered through Greenland's competent political and administrative institutions. Trump's October 2026 statement, however, does not establish that the government has reversed its policy. The Greenlandic government's published account of the Jameson Land project continues to distinguish the preservation of old licenses from the refusal to grant new petroleum exploration rights.
4. Jameson Land and American Oil Exploration
The Nunap Qeqqa/Jameson Land project in eastern Greenland provides the clearest example of American commercial participation in petroleum exploration under Greenland's existing licensing arrangements. The project concerns an onshore sedimentary basin where companies are investigating the potential presence of oil and natural gas.
Three petroleum licenses cover the project. Two were issued in 2015 and a third in 2018, before Naalakkersuisut adopted its policy against granting new hydrocarbon licenses. The Greenlandic government identifies them as exploration and exploitation licenses, although all three remain in the exploration phase (Naalakkersuisut, 2026a).
Their current periods extend to the end of 2028, with the possibility of further extensions under the relevant conditions. Continued validity depends on compliance with the obligations governing the licenses, including the commitments associated with successive exploration periods. No commercial petroleum discovery or production authorization has been established for the project.
4.1 Existing Licenses and American Investors
The official license holder is White Flame Energy A/S, a subsidiary of the British company 80 Mile PLC. Greenland's government has expressly clarified that Greenland Energy Company is not the formal holder of the petroleum licenses. Its involvement arises through commercial arrangements under which it participates as an investor and project operator (Naalakkersuisut, 2026a).
This distinction has legal consequences. The rights granted through a petroleum license belong to the identified license holder, subject to the conditions imposed by the authorities. Commercial partners may finance exploration, perform operational responsibilities, or obtain contractual interests without automatically replacing the legal entity recognized as the license holder.
On September 23, 2026, Greenland Energy Company, 80 Mile PLC, and March GL Company entered into a Deed of Variation and Novation concerning their existing Jameson Land farm-out agreement. The executed instrument, disclosed in a filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, transferred March GL's contractual position to Greenland Energy Company (Greenland Energy Company, 2026a).
The agreement also amended the contractual deadlines associated with two proposed exploration wells. The first deadline was extended from December 31, 2026, to December 31, 2028, while the second was extended from December 31, 2027, to December 31, 2028.
Under Clause 6.1, Greenland Energy assumed responsibility, at its own expense, for obtaining and maintaining the drilling permits, access rights, environmental and social approvals, and related permissions defined in the agreement. Responsibility for other specified government consents remained with 80 Mile under the relevant contractual provisions.
The allocation of these obligations does not determine the outcome of regulatory applications. The agreement establishes responsibilities between commercial parties, while the power to grant or refuse the required permissions remains with the competent public authorities.
The contractual drilling deadlines are legally distinct from the expiration dates of the underlying petroleum licenses. Their coincidence in December 2028 does not make a commercial obligation equivalent to a governmental authorization. Neither the contractual timetable nor the current license period establishes that a particular drilling operation has been approved.
4.2 Environmental Surveys and Proposed Drilling
Preparatory work at Jameson Land has involved environmental investigations intended to support possible future exploration. Greenlandic authorities authorized limited field activities in 2025 and 2026, but those approvals did not encompass the proposed exploratory drilling program.
The project encountered regulatory difficulties during 2026. Equipment associated with the exploration program was transported from Tasiilaq to Nerlerit Inaat, also known as Constable Point, without all the necessary approvals being in place. Naalakkersuisut subsequently warned the license holder about compliance with the applicable requirements.
The government also considered an application to move equipment into the licensed exploration area. That request was not approved. Significant portions of the license area overlap with wetlands designated under the Ramsar Convention, and Greenlandic authorities identified the need to protect sensitive environmental conditions when considering the proposed activities (Naalakkersuisut, 2026a).
Ramsar designation does not itself impose an automatic prohibition on every form of activity within a protected wetland. The legal consequences depend on the applicable conservation obligations, Greenlandic legislation, and the decisions of the competent authorities. In this instance, the authorities refused the requested equipment landing while permitting specified environmental investigations under conditions.
Environmental studies were approved for activities associated with licenses 2015-13 and 2015-14. These investigations were intended to collect information about habitats, vegetation, wildlife, and other environmental conditions relevant to future impact assessments. Greenland Energy announced on September 28 that its 2026 environmental field program had been completed (Greenland Energy Company, 2026b).
That announcement concerns the company's reported completion of authorized fieldwork. It does not establish that the government approved exploratory wells. The Greenlandic government's record separately identifies the limited surveys that received permission and the more extensive drilling activities that remain unauthorized.
On August 12, 2026, Naalakkersuisut announced that White Flame Energy's proposed drilling operations could not proceed during the winter of 2026–2027. The government concluded that the necessary environmental, social, and administrative procedures could not be completed before the planned commencement date.
The assessment also covered preparatory activities connected to the drilling program, including the mobilization and landing of drilling equipment and the establishment of a camp within the license area. Such operations could not proceed before completion of the relevant assessments and receipt of the necessary approvals (Naalakkersuisut, 2026b).
The project consequently remains commercially active but legally constrained. Its existing licenses provide a basis for pursuing exploration, while the government retains authority to assess applications and impose conditions. The September contractual amendments extend the time available for the commercial parties to pursue their objectives; they do not overcome the regulatory restrictions identified by Naalakkersuisut.
5. What Would Legally Permit Oil Drilling in Greenland?
Petroleum exploration in Greenland is governed primarily by the Mineral Resources Act, Inatsisartut Act No. 7 of December 7, 2009, as subsequently amended. The legislation establishes the principal requirements for activities involving hydrocarbons and defines the legal powers exercised by Naalakkersuisut.
The statutory position changed after Greenland adopted a separate Mining Act, Inatsisartut Act No. 26 of June 13, 2023, which entered into force on January 1, 2024. Section 3(2) of that legislation expressly excludes hydrocarbon activities from its scope. Oil and gas exploration consequently remain governed by the applicable provisions of the Mineral Resources Act rather than the regulatory regime introduced specifically for solid mineral activities (Inatsisartut, 2023).
Further amendments took effect on July 1, 2026. Inatsisartut Act No. 17 of May 29, 2026, revised Sections 3 and 3a of the Mineral Resources Act. Section 3 now designates Naalakkersuisut as the administrative authority for the mineral-resource area and requires an integrated approach to administrative processing.
The amended Section 3a preserves a separate requirement concerning environmental decision-making. Naalakkersuisut must ensure that the consideration of environmental and nature-related questions is conducted independently of other licensing and approval procedures. Environmental assessments and decisions must be based on evaluations and proposed decisions prepared by one or more scientifically independent institutions (Inatsisartut, 2026a).
A corresponding amendment to the Mining Act, Inatsisartut Act No. 18 of May 29, 2026, established related administrative provisions for the solid mineral sector (Inatsisartut, 2026b). The distinction between the two regimes remains significant: the Mining Act governs mineral activities within its defined scope, while the Mineral Resources Act continues to regulate hydrocarbons.
For petroleum operators, the existence of an exploration and exploitation license is the beginning of a regulatory process rather than its completion. The Mineral Resources Act provides for licenses covering hydrocarbon exploration and possible exploitation, but the conditions of those licenses determine the activities that may be undertaken and the requirements for moving between operational stages.
Section 22 of the Mineral Resources Act addresses the duration and extension of hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation licenses. It provides for exploration periods and, subject to specified conditions, extension toward exploitation of commercially viable discoveries. The statutory structure recognizes that identifying a prospective petroleum deposit and developing a producing field are separate activities (Inatsisartut, 2009, § 22, as amended).
The Jameson Land licenses illustrate the distinction. Naalakkersuisut identifies three principal stages: exploration, transition toward exploitation, and exploitation. The licenses remain in the first stage, which includes successive periods with defined work obligations. Advanced exploration activities, including drilling, require the relevant environmental assessments and administrative approvals.
For Jameson Land, the published approval procedure begins with a project description submitted for consideration by Naalakkersuisut. Once approved for preliminary consultation, the description is subject to a 35-day public consultation period. The company must address the comments received and revise the relevant documentation before advancing through the subsequent assessment stages (Naalakkersuisut, 2026a).
Environmental Impact Assessments and Social Impact Assessments must then be prepared for the proposed activities. The government's published procedure provides for an eight-week consultation on these assessments, including public meetings in affected areas. Naalakkersuisut must consider the final documentation before deciding whether the necessary approvals can be granted.
Environmental assessments concern potential effects on natural conditions, wildlife, habitats, and other protected interests. Social assessments address consequences for affected communities and relevant economic and social conditions. The authority responsible for licensing must consider these issues within the statutory requirements applicable to the proposed project.
The process also contemplates an Impact Benefit Agreement involving Naalakkersuisut, the relevant municipality, and the company. Such agreements may address local employment, training, professional development, and participation by Greenlandic suppliers. They do not replace environmental approvals or independently authorize drilling operations.
Project-specific restrictions may affect the feasibility of exploration even where an underlying petroleum license remains valid. The refused equipment-landing application at Jameson Land illustrates how environmental conditions and protected areas can restrict the practical exercise of licensed rights.
Exploratory drilling and commercial production are likewise subject to different legal and technical considerations. A well may provide evidence about the presence and characteristics of petroleum, but a discovery does not establish that the company has authorization to develop a producing field. Further assessments and approvals would be necessary before exploitation could begin.
Offshore petroleum exploration introduces an additional layer of international law. Under Article 56 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, a coastal state possesses sovereign rights for exploring and exploiting natural resources within its exclusive economic zone. Article 77 establishes the coastal state's sovereign rights over the natural resources of its continental shelf (United Nations, 1982).
Article 81 is particularly relevant to oil drilling. It provides that the coastal state has the exclusive right to authorize and regulate drilling on its continental shelf for all purposes. Offshore petroleum operations cannot lawfully be undertaken by another state or private operator merely because the relevant waters are accessible to vessels.
Denmark is a party to UNCLOS, while the United States has not ratified the Convention. The United States nevertheless recognizes substantial rules governing maritime zones and coastal-state resource rights as customary international law. The absence of American treaty participation does not create an independent right to drill on Greenland's continental shelf.
Within the Kingdom of Denmark, the international legal position of the coastal state operates alongside Greenland's transferred competence over mineral resources. Section 9 of the Mineral Resources Act expressly extends the legislation's geographical application to Greenland's land territory, territorial sea, continental-shelf area, and exclusive economic zone, subject to the relevant statutory qualifications.
The legal requirements for foreign petroleum companies consequently depend on the proposed location, the nature of the activity, and the applicable licensing conditions. American participation does not displace Greenlandic regulatory authority or Denmark's international legal position. A company must obtain the appropriate authorizations before commencing operations, regardless of its nationality or political support from Washington.
6. How Much Oil Does Greenland Actually Have?
Greenland has attracted petroleum exploration interest because several of its sedimentary basins possess geological characteristics associated with hydrocarbon formation and accumulation. Prospective areas occur both onshore and offshore, including parts of eastern and western Greenland.
The presence of a potentially productive geological basin, however, does not establish that commercially recoverable petroleum exists. Exploration involves identifying suitable geological formations, assessing the probability that hydrocarbons have accumulated, and determining whether any discovery could support economically viable production.
An important assessment was undertaken by the United States Geological Survey as part of its Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal. The USGS examined the East Greenland Rift Basins Province, working with geological information from the region to estimate undiscovered, technically recoverable petroleum resources.
Donald L. Gautier's USGS assessment, published in 2019 and based on geological work undertaken in 2007, estimated a mean of approximately 31.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent in undiscovered, technically recoverable oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids across the East Greenland Rift Basins Province (Gautier, 2019).
This figure is not an estimate of 31.4 billion barrels of proven crude-oil reserves. It combines several petroleum products expressed in equivalent energy terms and concerns resources whose existence and recoverability are assessed probabilistically rather than established through commercial discoveries.
The geographical scope is also important. The USGS divided the province into seven assessment units, five of which were evaluated quantitatively. The Jameson Land Basin and the Jameson Land Basin Subvolcanic Extension were identified as assessment units but were not quantitatively assessed.
The regional estimate cannot consequently be attributed directly to the Jameson Land licenses. The USGS concluded that most of the estimated undiscovered petroleum in the wider province was likely to occur offshore, particularly in the North and South Danmarkshavn Salt Basins.
The distinction between technically recoverable resources and proven reserves is fundamental. A technically recoverable resource is estimated to be extractable using available technology, without necessarily establishing that extraction would be commercially profitable. Proven reserves require a different evidentiary basis, including confidence in economically recoverable quantities under specified conditions.
Greenland presents substantial practical difficulties for petroleum development. Its remote exploration areas, limited infrastructure, demanding environmental conditions, and transportation requirements can increase costs and complicate drilling operations. These constraints affect the economic value of a potential discovery independently of the quantity of petroleum that may exist underground.
They also qualify Trump's claim concerning the accessibility of Greenlandic oil. Geological estimates do not establish that the island contains one of the world's largest proven petroleum reserves or that extraction would be comparatively easy. Such conclusions would require direct evidence of recoverable deposits and the technical and economic conditions necessary for development.
At Jameson Land, Naalakkersuisut states that no commercial quantities of petroleum have been discovered. The exploration program is intended to obtain information about the geological formations and determine whether the conditions for a commercially viable petroleum project exist (Naalakkersuisut, 2026a).
Even successful exploratory drilling would not necessarily lead to production. The company would need to determine the size and characteristics of any deposit, evaluate technical feasibility, assess financial viability, and secure the regulatory approvals required for exploitation.
Greenland's rare-earth deposits and other solid mineral resources must be considered separately. Rare earth elements may be important for industrial production and strategic supply chains, but their extraction is governed by the legislation applicable to solid minerals rather than the hydrocarbon provisions governing petroleum.
The Mining Act, which entered into force in 2024 and was amended in 2026, provides the principal regime for these mineral activities. Greenland's 2021 decision against issuing new oil and gas licenses did not establish a corresponding general prohibition on rare-earth mining. Companies pursuing such projects remain subject to the distinct licensing and environmental requirements governing their activities.
Trump's reference to oil, gas, and minerals consequently encompasses resources governed by different legal and geological conditions. Commercial interest in one sector cannot establish the feasibility or legality of development in another.
The available petroleum assessments demonstrate geological potential, but they do not establish the existence of immediately recoverable commercial oil reserves. The scale and viability of Greenland's petroleum resources remain dependent on exploration results, technological and economic conditions, and regulatory decisions.
Also read
Conclusion
Donald Trump's October 2026 announcement does not give the United States the authority to drill for oil in Greenland. The territory remains within the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark, while Greenlandic authorities exercise statutory control over the administration and exploitation of natural resources. Section 2 of the Mineral Resources Act expressly assigns Greenland Self-Government the right to dispose of and exploit subsurface mineral resources, and the September 2026 defense agreement does not transfer those rights to Washington.
Greenland's 2021 decision to stop issuing new hydrocarbon licenses remains a central restriction on additional petroleum exploration. Previously granted licenses may continue to provide a legal basis for projects, but their holders must satisfy the applicable statutory conditions and obtain authorization for particular operations.
The Jameson Land project demonstrates how American companies may participate in Greenland's petroleum sector without acquiring independent rights to drill. Its existing licenses remain valid, and commercial arrangements have extended the deadlines for proposed exploration wells. Yet Naalakkersuisut has not approved the drilling program, and the required environmental and administrative procedures remain incomplete.
The geological position is similarly unsettled. Scientific assessments identify potentially substantial undiscovered petroleum resources, but they do not establish commercially recoverable reserves or confirm that oil extraction would be straightforward. Greenland's petroleum development depends on discoveries, economic feasibility, compliance with environmental requirements, and decisions by its competent authorities. Those legal and practical conditions remain in place regardless of American political ambitions.
References
Gautier, D.L. (2019) Geology and assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources of the East Greenland Rift Basins Province, 2008. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1824-K. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1824K (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Greenland Energy Company (2026a) Deed of Variation and Novation, 23 September 2026. Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on 24 September 2026 [online]. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2093507/000182912626010363/greenlandenergy_ex10-1.htm (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Greenland Energy Company (2026b) Greenland Energy Company Confirms Government-Approved Environmental Baseline Program Completed in Jameson Land, 28 September 2026. Exhibit 99.1 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [online]. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2093507/000182912626010444/greenlandenergyco_ex99-1.htm (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Inatsisartut (2009) Inatsisartutlov nr. 7 af 7. december 2009 om mineralske råstoffer og aktiviteter af betydning herfor (råstofloven) [Mineral Resources Act], 7 December 2009, as amended [online]. Available at: https://nalunaarutit.gl/groenlandsk-lovgivning/2009/ltl-07-2009?sc_lang=da (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Inatsisartut (2023) Inatsisartutlov nr. 26 af 13. juni 2023 om mineralaktiviteter [Mining Act], 13 June 2023, entered into force 1 January 2024 [online]. Available at: https://nalunaarutit.gl/groenlandsk-lovgivning/2023/inatsisartutlov-nr-26-af-13_06_2023?sc_lang=da (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Inatsisartut (2026a) Inatsisartutlov nr. 17 af 29. maj 2026 om ændring af Inatsisartutlov om mineralske råstoffer og aktiviteter af betydning herfor [Amendment to the Mineral Resources Act], 29 May 2026, entered into force 1 July 2026 [online]. Available at: https://nalunaarutit.gl/groenlandsk-lovgivning/2026/inatsisartutlov-nr-17-af-29_05_2026?sc_lang=da (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Inatsisartut (2026b) Inatsisartutlov nr. 18 af 29. maj 2026 om ændring af Inatsisartutlov om mineralaktiviteter [Amendment to the Mining Act], 29 May 2026, entered into force 1 July 2026 [online]. Available at: https://nalunaarutit.gl/groenlandsk-lovgivning/2026/inatsisartutlov-nr-18-af-29_05_2026?sc_lang=da (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Kingdom of Denmark (2009) Act on Greenland Self-Government, Act No. 473 of 12 June 2009, 12 June 2009. Official English translation published by the Danish Prime Minister's Office [online]. Available at: https://stm.dk/media/4vgewyoh/gl-selvstyrelov-uk.pdf (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Mineral Resources Authority (2022) Closure of the 2020 Open Door Procedure for Onshore Areas on Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Paninsula, West Greenland, 30 September 2022. Government of Greenland [online]. Available at: https://govmin.gl/2022/09/closure-of-the-2020-open-door-procedure-for-onshore-areas-on-disko-island-and-the-nuussuaq-paninsula-west-greenland/ (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Naalakkersuisut (2026a) Projektet i Nunap Qeqqa / Jameson Land [The Nunap Qeqqa / Jameson Land Project]. Department of Business and Mineral Resources, Government of Greenland [online]. Available at: https://naalakkersuisut.gl/Departementer/Erhverv_og_Raastoffer/Nunap-Qeqqa_Jameson-Land?sc_lang=da (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Naalakkersuisut (2026b) Naalakkersuisut vurderer, at planlagte boreaktiviteter ikke kan gennemføres i vinteren 2026/2027 i Nunap Qeqqa / Jameson Land [Government of Greenland assesses that planned drilling activities cannot proceed during winter 2026–2027 in Nunap Qeqqa / Jameson Land], 12 August 2026. Government of Greenland [online]. Available at: https://naalakkersuisut.gl/Nyheder/2026/08/1208_Naalakkersuisut_nalilerpaat?sc_lang=da (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Reuters (2026a) ‘Greenland lawmakers signal support for Trump security deal’, Reuters, 12 October [online]. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/greenland-lawmakers-signal-support-trump-security-deal-2026-10-12/ (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
Reuters (2026b) ‘Trump says “massive” oil, gas and mineral exploration to begin in Greenland’, Reuters, 14 October [online]. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-says-oil-gas-mineral-exploration-begin-greenland-2026-10-14/ (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
United Nations (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, adopted at Montego Bay on 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November 1994, 1833 UNTS 3 [online]. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?chapter=21&clang=_en&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&src=TREATY (Accessed: 14 October 2026).
United States, Denmark and Greenland (2026) Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark Together with the Government of Greenland to Amend and Supplement the Agreement of 27 April 1951 Pursuant to the North Atlantic Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark on the Defense of Greenland (1951 Defense Agreement), Including All Relevant Subsequent Agreements Related Thereto, signed at New York on 22 September 2026. Washington, DC: The White House [online]. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2026/09/agreement-between-the-government-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-the-government-of-the-kingdom-of-denmark-together-with-the-government-of-greenland-to-amend-and-supplement-the-agreement-of-27-apri/ (Accessed: 14 October 2026).